The question that I am wondering today is about moral policing. Yeah its bad ... who the hell is anyone else to tell me what I am supposed to do with my life, what is morally correct and what is not. Their ethics their principles... well let them take care of it. Don't force them on me. This is against people who try to say that girls should not wear provocative clothes or should not go to discs and bars or those Taaliban people telling that girls are not supposed to get educated.. well... thats correct I did not agree with them all... I read it some where : Values are the tape that we play in the walkman of our minds, any tune is fine as long as it does not disturb others.... someone said it rather well...
But should you never stop anyone from doing anything on moral grounds? I believe that I have too many redundant and outdated ethical values. I do not like it when people use office property for personal use too much. When you make unnecessary personal calls from office. I do not like it when you bribe the police man or the passport agent. I do not like when someone lies to others in order to get some kind of favour. Its not that I have never been tempted to do these. But somehow I could never do something that did not seem correct. I am sure that things that lie in morally grey area for me must be grossly wrong for some others. All of us have some sense of right and wrong, whether we listen to that voice or not is a question. But are you not supposed to stop anyone from doing anything?
If you know that someone is cheating on his wife or her husband are you supposed to stay mum? If you know that someone has sent fake resumes for job or has been lying about his income to the tax officers should you just watch that in silence? Or when you see someone not taking bus ticket or not working in the office or throwing wastes on streets? I know that things often disturb my peace and I have to consciously stop myself from speaking and I don't like it a bit.
If I am allowed to comment on these issues, do I give others a right to comment on my attire as well. There is no defined limit probably, except that use of physical force is not a valid rule of the game. Well guess that means for the time being people can use office phones for personal calls, not buy ticket or yell in public places.. I will not stop them. But I am sure someday my patience will give up and I will wear that moral police uniform!!!!
Child-free by choice: A growing trend
9 years ago
2 comments:
I think you have mixed up moral policing (where standards are not defined and every other will have different understanding of what is right and what is wrong), with rule,law and order (where standards,guidelines etc.. are well written and well defined and if people do have knowledge of these rules or guidelines, they will pretty much have same or similar understanding for it).
for example, whether girls should wear clothes of her choice? it is moral policing. Whether someone should travel without a ticket? well that is breaking a well documented law. I hope you got the difference. Moral policing is certainly bad, while adhering to rule of law, and raising a whistle when someone else doesn't is not moral policing, it is being a good citizen of the country.
Technically, rules are accepted moral values only.
You should stand in a queue, waiting for ticket. You should not talk loudly in a theatre. A lot of things are not as well documented as they should be!!!
Post a Comment